Switch to open-source models without giving up accuracy.

UACL lifts a 27B model from 84% to 92.4% on GPQA Diamond: frontier accuracy on a single GPU, inside your own environment, without fine-tuning or training.

how it works

Drops into the stack you already run.  

UACL sits between your application and your open-source model. Keep your tools and prompts. Nothing leaves your environment.

A confident wrong answer costs more than a slow one. It just bills you later.

Post-hoc verification means generating an answer, paying a second model to check it, then shipping it anyway if the check misses. UACL traces the LLM’s own logic, catches contradictions as they form, and stops hallucinations and jailbreaks before an output exists.

Your LLM provides the language. UACL provides the reasoning. Together, they produce answers you can trust.

One API call. One pass. No verification tax. 

DATA SOVEREIGNTY

We only ever see vectors, at inference. Never your raw data.  

Your documents, databases and LLM run entirely inside your perimeter. The UACL API interacts adaptively only with vectorised representations at the moment of inference. There’s no logs captured on our side, ever. 

Sovereignty is the same principle as correctness: it has to be structural, not promised.

ACCURACY IS EFFICIENCY

Precision costs less than correction. 

UACL is both a reasoning model and an agent. Where other platforms deploy multiple agents to chase a single answer, our algorithm navigates directly toward the grounded truth. Stop paying to generate mistakes, then paying again to find them.

The result: fewer tokens. Every time.

Have a Question?

How long does deployment actually take?

Do we have to replace our current models or infrastructure?

No. UACL is model-agnostic and runs as a layer above your existing stack. You keep your models, your infrastructure, your orchestration, and your data. UACL intercepts reasoning, governs it, and returns the answer, everything else stays as it is.

How do I reduce my enterprise AI token bill?

Most AI platforms deploy multiple agents to chase a single answer: one to retrieve, others to verify, rank and reconcile each burning tokens independently before a final response is produced. UACL replaces that with a single recursive reasoning loop that navigates directly toward the correct answer. Fewer agents means fewer tokens.

How does an agentic layer reduce the cost of enterprise AI?
Most enterprise AI stacks deploy multiple agents to produce a single answer, retrieve, embed, rank, verify, reconcile, generate. Each agent burns tokens independently. UACL collapses that chain into one recursive reasoning loop that navigates directly toward the grounded answer. The result is not cheaper tokens, it’s that fewer tokens are needed. One loop instead of six agents. Right the first time instead of paying for the correction. The architectural efficiency shows up directly on your compute invoice.
How do I govern and audit AI outputs across my organisation??

AI governance in regulated industries requires more than a policy, it requires a system that can show exactly what the model accessed, what it reasoned from and what drove each answer. UACL retrieves from named sources, flags conflicts between documents and keeps human decision-makers in the loop rather than resolving ambiguity silently. Our transparent approach ensures every AI output in your sovereign deployment can be traced back to its source.

How does UACL make enterprise AI safer?
AI models were never designed to be honest they were designed to be helpful and that is not the same thing. A model trained to generate the most probable answer will always choose confidence over truth. UACL addresses that at the architecture level, not the policy level. By verifying every claim before it reaches your model, UACL ensures that what gets generated is grounded in your verified sources. When the evidence is not there, UACL says so. AI safety is not a setting. It is a design choice and UACL is built around it.
How do you stop an AI from hallucinating before it happens, not after?

Most hallucination detection waits for the mistake to appear and then flags it, but by that point, the hallucination has already been generated and your enterprise has received an answer it cannot trust. Inside UACL, we monitor two internal signals in real time during the reasoning process: confidence and consistency. When these diverge, when the model is highly certain but that certainty is unstable across reasoning steps, we have identified a pre-hallucination state and intervene before it reaches the output. The result is not a model that catches hallucinations after the fact. It is a model that was never going to produce one in the first place. As a result, UACL provides you an honest answer “I don’t know” instead of quietly and confidently providing an inaccurate response.